Vindiola
Vindiola v. San Diego County Sheriff's Department
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GINO VINDIOLA, Case No.: 3:24-cv-2070-CAB-MSB
CDCR #BR9953,
ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION
Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS [ECF No. 2];
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
(2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR DEPARTMENT; ROMO, Corporal;
FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM
GONZALEZ, Deputy
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
Defendants. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b) 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Gino Vindiola (“Plaintiff” or “Vindiola”), an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See ECF Nos. 1, 2. In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges his constitutional rights were violated when Defendants delayed providing him with medical care. See generally, ECF No. 1. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s IFP motion and dismisses the…