IN RE CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 IN RE CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES Case No. 5:20-cv-06326-EJD
9 This Document Relates To: ORDER OF SERVICE 10 23-cv-04795; Odell v. Bloomfield et al. 11
13 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that 12 Defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) officials were responsible for his contracting COVID-19 in July 2020, and that Defendant Dr. Xu/Tzue, his primary care provider, was deliberately indifferent to his need for medical care for post-covid syndrome. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 10. The Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend on January 8, 2024, finding that Plaintiff had presented a cognizable claim against Dr. Xu/Tzue for deliberate indifference to his medical needs in the treatment of plaintiff’s COVID-19 and other medical issues, but directing …