Seifert

Seifert v. Pritchard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20251:24-cv-01097California4,487 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDRA SEIFERT, Case No. 1:24-cv-01097-KES-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. 8) KENNETH PRITCHARD, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants. TO DISMISS COMPLAINT WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

16 21-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff Alexandra Seifert, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242, 18 U.S.C. § 1018, 28 U.S.C. § 454, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff filed her complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on September 16, 2024. (Docs. 1, 2). I. Order Vacating Prior Findings and Recommendations The undersigned issued findings and recommendations to dismiss the complaint without leave to amend on November 15, 2024. (Doc. 8). After the Court granted Plaintiff two extensions of time to file her objections to the findings and recommendations (Docs. 11, 13), Plaintiff filed untimely objections (Doc. 14), as well…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.