Prado
(PC) Reed v. Prado
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZAYA REED, No. 2:23-cv-1101 KJM CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER OFFICER PRADO, et al. , Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is pending. (ECF No. 18.) The Court has reviewed the parties’ filings and finds that further briefing is required. Missing Documents First, although defendants refer to a declaration by defendant Whitney (ECF No. 18-2 at 3-4) (“Whitney declaration”), no declaration by defendant Whitney was filed with the motion for summary judgment. In addition, the Whitney declaration is not listed on the certificate of service of documents that were served on plaintiff. (ECF No. 18-12 at 2.) Therefore, defendants must file and serve the Whitney declaration. In addition, the declaration of Toni Taylor (“Taylor declaration”) refers to an Exhibit A (strip search affidavit), but no Exhibit A was appended to the 27 …