Jamalinia

Jamalinia v. Blinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20252:24-cv-00981California4,180 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELAHE JAMALINIA, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-0981-JDP Plaintiffs, v. ORDER MARCO RUBIO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Elahe Jamalinia and Mehrdad Moshtaghi, husband and wife, bring this action against Marco Rubio, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of State, and Robert Jachim, in his official capacity as Acting Director of Screening, Analysis, and Coordination, for unreasonably delaying adjudication of plaintiffs’ immigrant visa applications. The court finds that there has been no unreasonable delay in adjudicating plaintiffs’ visa application and thus will grant defendants’ motion. 23 24 25

1 Defendants Rubio and Jachim were automatically substituted for Anthony Blinken and Carson Wu, respectively, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d); ECF No. 17 (for defendant Jachim). Background I. Statutory and Regulatory Framework The Immigration and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.