Greenlaw
Greenlaw v. Su
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ROSEMARY GREENLAW, Case No. 18-cv-04932-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE COURT OR JURY TRIAL
v.
VINCENT N. MICONE, Defendant.
13 The Court thanks the parties for their March 8, 2025 supplemental briefs (Dkt. Nos. 171, 172) regarding Ms. Greenlaw’s claim for monetary relief and whether this matter should proceed to a trial by jury. Based on the parties’ arguments, the Court rules as follows: Although Ms. Greenlaw’s operative amended complaint (Dkt. No. 8) does not specify the particular section of the Rehabilitation Act on which her disability discrimination/disparate treatment claim is based, section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act provides her sole remedy for alleged disability discrimination in federal employment. See Boyd v. U.S. Postal Serv., 752 F.2d 410, 413 (9th Cir. 1985); Gunzenhauser v. Garland, No. 22-cv-03406-WHO, 2023 WL 2167387, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2023) (citing cases). The remedies, procedures, and rights…