Alla Zorikova v. Kineticflix, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202522-55531California834 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALLA ANATOLYEVNA ZORIKOVA, No. 22-55531

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04214-ODW-GJS v.

KINETICFLIX, LLC, DBA KineticFlix.com, MEMORANDUM* a California corporation, Erroneously Sued As Elles, LLC; DOES, 1-5, individuals,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 10, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Alla Zorikova appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Kineticflix, LLC. Zorikova

sued Kineticflix, a mail-order DVD rental service, for copyright infringement,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). vicarious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.