Bondi

Tellez Camacho v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202524-705California902 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OCTAVIO TELLEZ No. 24-705 CAMACHO; T.T.C.; O.T.C.; OLIVIA Agency Nos.

CONTRERAS MALDONADO; D.P.T.C., A097-827-291

A216-918-033

Petitioners,

A216-918-034

A216-918-076

v. A216-918-077 PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 6, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: SANCHEZ and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and DONATO, District Judge.***

Petitioners Octavio Tellez Camacho, his wife Olivia Contreras Maldonado,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable James Donato, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. and their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.