Bondi

Otiniano Paucarcaja v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202524-2245California660 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BEATRIZ JOSEPHINE OTINIANO No. 24-2245 PAUCARCAJA, Agency No.

A209-865-156

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 6, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: SANCHEZ and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and DONATO, District Judge.***

Beatriz Josephine Otiniano Paucarcaja, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions

for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable James Donato, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. decision by an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.