Doe Ls 340 v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JANE DOE LS 340 et al., No. 24-5063 D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellees, 3:23-md-03084-CRB v.

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; RASIER, MEMORANDUM*

LLC; RASIER-CA, LLC,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 8, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLA (“Uber”) appeal

from the district court’s order declaring the collective action waiver in Uber’s

terms of use (the “Collective Action Waiver”) unenforceable. We previously

granted Uber permission to file this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. consolidated this appeal with Uber’s pending petition for writ of mandamus

because they…