Cruz-Coello

Cruz-Coello v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202524-683California459 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDGAR ARMANDO CRUZ- No. 24-683 COELLO; NAYELI ABIGAIL CRUZ- Agency Nos.

PALMA; DANIA MELISA PALMA- A203-470-789

FLORES; ALLISON DAHOMEY CRUZ- A215-584-081

PALMA,

A215-584-080

A203-470-790

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted March 3, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, IKUTA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Edgar Cruz-Coello, his wife Dania Palma-Flores, and their daughters,

Allison Cruz-Palma and Nayeli Cruz-Palma, natives and citizens of Honduras,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of their

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of their asylum, withholding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.