Cornell

Cornell v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202524-1304California861 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

QUIAD AKEEM CORNELL, No. 24-1304 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 5:22-cv-02261-CAS-KS v.

MEMORANDUM*

WARREN L. MONTGOMERY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 5, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, CLIFTON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Quaid Akeem Cornell appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§§ 1291 and 2253. We affirm.

We review de novo the district court’s denial of a petition for habeas corpus.

Lambert v. Blodgett, 393 F.3d 943, 964 (9th Cir. 2004). The Antiterrorism and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) applies to this petition. Because Cornell

seeks relief based on claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.