Ramirez-Gregorio

Ramirez-Gregorio v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202524-567California917 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MERSELIA RAMIREZ- No. 24-567 GREGORIO; BRYLI LUCAS-RAMIREZ, Agency Nos.

A220-456-811

Petitioners, A220-456-842 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 5, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and SANCHEZ and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Merselia Ramirez-Gregorio (“Petitioner”) and her minor daughter, citizens

of Guatemala, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision dismissing her appeal of an order from an Immigration Judge (“IJ”)

(collectively, the “agency”). The IJ denied Petitioner’s applications for asylum,

withholding of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.