P.

P. v. Nash CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 25, 2013H037740California4,813 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manoukian, J.

Filed 7/25/13 P. v. Nash CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H037740

(Santa Cruz County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. F18291)

v.

RICHARD NELSON NASH,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury convicted defendant Richard Nelson Nash of possession of child pornography (Pen. Code, § 311.11, subd. (a)), and possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)).1 During trial, defendant admitted the allegations that he had suffered five prior violent or serious felony “strike” convictions. In December 2011, the court sentenced him to two indeterminate terms of 25 years to life in prison to be served concurrently. During sentencing, the court awarded a total of 82 days of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.