Bolander

Bolander v. Bolander CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 25, 2013A133834California12,651 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richman, J.

Filed 7/25/13 Bolander v. Bolander CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

RINSKE BOLANDER,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A133834

v. FREDERICK BOLANDER, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. CIV 492551) Defendant and Appellant.

RINSKE BOLANDER,

A134509

Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. CIV 492551)

FREDERICK BOLANDER,

Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff Rinske Bolander (Rinske) sued her now ex-husband, defendant Frederick (Rick) Bolander, for domestic violence after he twice drugged her with Ambien and engaged in nonconsensual sexual intercourse with her while she was incapacitated.1 A jury found in favor of Rinske, awarding her $30,000 in economic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.