Serrano

Serrano v. Social Security Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20253:24-cv-02354California2,508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 ALFONSO S., Case No.: 24-cv-02354-MMP

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN

SOCIAL SECURITY

FORMA PAUPERIS

ADMINISTRATION,

17 Defendant. 2. DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINTS WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

20 [ECF No. 2] 21 22 On December 16, 2024, Alfonso S. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action pro se. Plaintiff consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. [ECF No. 4.] As best the Court can tell, Plaintiff

26 1 In accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b), the Court refers to all non-government parties by using their first name and last initial. 28 disputes he owes Defendant several thousand dollars for a period during which he received Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) despite being ineligible. [ECF No. 1.] Plaintiff also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [ECF No. 2.] The Court DENIES the motion for leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.