Salvador Venegas v. Chad Bianco
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 SALVADOR VENEGAS, Case No. 5:19-cv-01557-JLS-SHK
Plaintiff,
ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART AND
v. REJECTING IN PART THE FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
CHAD BIANCO, et al., STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendants.
16 17 18 19
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has performed a de novo review of the relevant record, including the First Amended Complaint (“FAC,” Doc. 15),1 the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants County of Riverside and its Sheriff’s Department (Doc. 24), the Motion to Dismiss filed by individual Officer Defendants (Doc. 71), Plaintiff’s Opposition to both Motions (Doc. 76), the Reply brief filed by all Defendants (Doc. 77), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“R&R,” Doc. 80), Defendants’ Objection to the R&R (Doc. 82), Plaintiff’s Objection to the R&R (Doc. 85), and Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. 86). Pursuant to the Court’s review,…