Doerer

(PC) Lanier v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20251:24-cv-01178California1,382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM LANIER, No. 1:24-cv-01178 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO CREATE A CLASS ACTION; HIS

v. MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME,

AND HIS MOTION FOR

J. DOERER, RECONSIDERATION Defendant. (ECF Nos. 14, 15, 17) PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT DUE IN THIRTY DAYS

18 Plaintiff, a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 19 rights action seeking relief under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of 20 Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (federal prisoner). The matter was referred to a United States 21 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 Before this Court are Plaintiff’s motion to create a class action; his motion for a ninety- 23 day extension of time, and his motion for reconsideration. ECF Nos. 14, 15, 17. For the reasons 24 stated below, all three motions will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.