Diaz

(PC) Washington v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20252:20-cv-02261California5,917 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER NATHANIEL No. 2:20-cv-2261 KJM AC P

WASHINGTON,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS & v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 RALPH DIAZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court are defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 126) and plaintiff’s various motions for miscellaneous relief (ECF Nos. 137-141). I. Procedural History This case proceeds on plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint. ECF No. 54. On screening, the court found that plaintiff had stated cognizable claims for failure to protect and retaliation against defendants Emerson and Coder,1 and his claims against defendant Meza were dismissed without leave to amend. ECF Nos. 76, 84. After the close of discovery, defendants moved for summary judgment (ECF No. 126) which plaintiff opposes (ECF No. 131). ////

Coder was incorrectly identified as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.