(PC) James v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20252:21-cv-00713California1,951 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, Case No. 2:21-cv-0713-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has four motions pending: a motion for court-ordered law library access and “extraction,” ECF No. 82; a motion to show cause, ECF No. 86; a motion to change the name of the case, ECF No. 88; and a motion to compel, ECF No. 89. Defendants oppose the motion to compel. ECF No. 90. Plaintiff’s motions are denied. Motion for Court-Ordered Law Library Access and for Extraction Plaintiff first moves this court to order his current jail to give him access to the law library. ECF No. 82. He contends that he received discovery on flash drives that he cannot access without using the law library, and that the jail is impeding his ability to access the library. Id. at 1-2. Plaintiff may show this order to the appropriate officials and offer it as verification that he is litigating this action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.