(PC) Littleton v. County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LITTLETON, Case No. 2:22-cv-0567-TLN-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 The court closed this action on February 23, 2023, because plaintiff failed to state claim for relief, failed to comply with court orders, and failed to prosecute. ECF No. 19. Now, more than two years later, plaintiff has filed a request to refund his filing fee, ECF No. 22, a new motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 23, and a motion to appoint counsel, ECF No. 24.1 For the foregoing reasons, each motion is denied, and plaintiff is cautioned that any future documents filed by him in this case will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response. Plaintiff filed an identical motion to refund his filing fee in another closed action in this district. See Littleton v. Montiez, 2:22-cv-1067-TLN-AC. Judge Claire denied that motion. She explained that because plaintiff applied for and was granted to…