(PC) Merino v. St. Joaquing Gn Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20252:22-cv-00520California1,241 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRANCISCO MERINO, No. 2:22-cv-00520 WBS SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER ST. JOAQUING GN HOSPITAL, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner who has filed a “motion to reopen” his civil rights action. (ECF No. 81.) The court construes the filing as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s civil rights action concerned alleged improper medical care while he was in custody at Folsom State Prison and Lancaster State Prison. (See ECF No. 59.) On March 13, 2024, Judge Barnes, the previously assigned magistrate judge issued a screening order recommending that plaintiff’s third amended complaint (“TAC”) be dismissed without leave to amend because of plaintiff’s repeated failure, after multiple warnings, to allege facts showing how each individual defendant personally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.