(PC) Rodriquez v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20252:24-cv-00024California3,462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILSON RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:24-cv-0024 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) for screening1 (ECF No. 7) and motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 8). IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Although plaintiff has not submitted his application on the proper Eastern District form, a review of the verified document plaintiff has submitted provides sufficient information to enable the court to determine his indigent status. (See generally ECF No. 8.) Therefore, in the interest of efficiency, plaintiff’s in forma pauperis motion (ECF No. 8) shall be granted. As a civil detainee, plaintiff is not subject to the Prison Litigation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.