Chapple

] 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |) MARQUISE CHAPPLE, Case No. 2:24-cv-01939-TLN-CSK V2 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED B y PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No. 24) COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 24), and 18 || finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The 19 || Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 21 || jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 11141 .1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case).…