Estate of Clemente Najera Aguirre v. County of Riverside
Opinion
Opinion
McKeown, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ESTATE OF CLEMENTE NAJERA No. 23-55718
AGUIRRE; J.S.; A.S.; Y.S.,
D.C. No. 5:18-cv- Plaintiffs-Appellees, 00762-DMG-SP
v.
OPINION
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; DAN
PONDER,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 17, 2024 Seattle, Washington
Filed March 11, 2025
Before: M. Margaret McKeown, Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges, and Jane A. Restani *, Judge.
Opinion by Judge McKeown
* The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. ESTATE OF NAJERA-AGUIRRE V. CITY OF RIVERSIDE
SUMMARY **
Excessive Force
The panel affirmed the district court’s order denying Riverside County Sergeant Dan Ponder’s renewed motion, following a jury verdict, for judgment as a matter of law based on qualified immunity in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Ponder used excessive force when he shot and killed Clemente Najera-Aguirre. Ponder arrived at the scene after responding to a call about…