Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 11, 202523-3406California986 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIME UGALDE BARRON, No. 23-2400 Agency No. Petitioner, A091-867-989 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 3, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.

Jaime Ugalde Barron (“Ugalde”), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of a final order of removal issued by an Immigration Judge (“IJ”). We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant Ugalde’s petition for review

and remand his case to the agency for further proceedings.

On August 31, 2023, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security issued a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Notice of Intent to Issue a Final Administrative Removal Order (“NOI”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.