People v. Vargas CA4/3

DISCUSSION

Effective January 1, 2022, section 1172.75 provides that certain one-year sentence enhancements for prior prison terms imposed under former section 667.5(b) are legally invalid and provides a mechanism for resentencing individuals serving judgments that include one or more of those enhancements. (§ 1172.75, subds. (a)–(c).) The question before us in this appeal is whether section 1172.75 entitles a defendant to a resentencing hearing if the defendant’s prior prison term enhancement was stayed for the purposes of sentencing. There is a split of authority on the issue, and we await resolution by our Supreme Court. In our own district, the divisions have disagreed on the issue. (Compare Rhodius, supra, 97 Cal.App.5th at pp. 40–41, 45, 48–49 [§ 1172.75 does not authorize resentencing for stayed prior prison term enhancements], rev.gr., with People v. Christianson (2023) 97 Cal.App.5th 300, 305 [§ 1172.75 requires resentencing for stayed prior prison term enhancement], review granted, Feb. 21, 2024, S283189 (Christianson).)2 Vargas argues the plain language of section 1172.75 does not limit its application to cases in which the enhancement was ordered to be

2 We are aware…