Meyer

Meyer v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20253:21-cv-00341California6,147 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:21-cv-0341-RSH (BLM) WILLIAM MEYER, et al. ,

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

v. [ECF No. 264] COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

Defendants.

18 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff William Meyer’s January 10, 2025 Motion to Compel Defendants Valenzuela, Craft, Paugh, and Snyder (“Defendants”) to Provide Further Responses to Discovery. ECF No. 264. On January 17, 2025, Defendants filed an Opposition (“Oppo.”). ECF No. 267. On January 24, 2025, Plaintiff filed his Reply (“Reply”). ECF No. 268. On January 28, 2025, Plaintiff filed a “Supplemental Declaration,” without leave of court. ECF No. 269.

26 1 On January 12, 2025, Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Errata re: Exhibits” and submitted Exhibits H- Z and AA-TT that he was not able to file with the original motion due to “technical issues.” After reviewing Plaintiff’s MTC, the Defendants’ Oppo, Plaintiff’s Reply and all supporting documents,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.