Garcia

(PC) Scott v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20251:20-cv-00317California1,340 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE RENEE SCOTT, Case No. 1:20-cv-00317 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL,

v. GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING

CHARLES EDWARDS and T. YOUNG, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF

Defendants. COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Docs. 37, 46, 64) 17 Andre Renee Scott asserts Charles Edwards and T. Young—who provide dental care at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility—were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs related to his number 9 tooth, in violation of his rights arising under the Eighth Amendment. (See generally Doc. 28.) The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docs. 37, 46.). The magistrate judge noted Defendants submitted Plaintiff’s CDCR dental records, which were authenticated by B.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.