Garcia
(PC) Scott v. Garcia
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE RENEE SCOTT, Case No. 1:20-cv-00317 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL,
v. GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING
CHARLES EDWARDS and T. YOUNG, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF
Defendants. COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Docs. 37, 46, 64) 17 Andre Renee Scott asserts Charles Edwards and T. Young—who provide dental care at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility—were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs related to his number 9 tooth, in violation of his rights arising under the Eighth Amendment. (See generally Doc. 28.) The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docs. 37, 46.). The magistrate judge noted Defendants submitted Plaintiff’s CDCR dental records, which were authenticated by B.…