Longoria

(PC) Duran v. Longoria

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20251:20-cv-00289California605 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PAUL EDWARD DURAN., Case No. 1:20-cv-00289-HBK (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S SURREPLY

v. (Doc. No. 80) LONGORIA,

Defendant.

15 On February 27, 2025, Plaintiff filed a pleading titled “Clarification to his Objections/Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment,” which the Court construes as a Surreply. (Doc. No. 79, “Surreply”). In response, Defendant filed a Motion to Strike the pleading on March 4, 2025. (Doc. No. 80, “Motion”). The Court grants the Motion. On December 23, 2024, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 73). After being afforded an extension of time, Plaintiff filed an opposition on January 24, 2025. (Doc. No. 76). Defendant filed a reply on February 10, 2025. (Doc. No. 78). Thereafter, without requesting leave, Plaintiff filed the construed Surreply. (Doc. No. 79). Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, nor the Local Rules for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.