Christian

Christian v. Betak

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20253:24-cv-01867California3,457 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DONALD J. CHRISTIAN, Case No. 24-cv-01867-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISQUALIFY

GEORGE M. BETAK, Re: Dkt. No. 33 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant George M. Betak’s Motion to Disqualify Attorney Robert Moll, who represents Plaintiff Donald J. Christian. ECF No. 33. Christian filed an Opposition (ECF No. 36)1 and Betak filed a Reply (ECF No. 39). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the March 13, 2025 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.2 II. BACKGROUND This action concerns a dispute between two co-owners of GoPlug, a California corporation that designs, manufactures and sells electric vehicle chargers. First Am. Compl. ¶ 6, ECF No. 31. Christian and Betak co-founded GoPlug LLC in 2018 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.