Robinson
Robinson v. Lee
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID ROBINSON, Case No. 24-cv-04228-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
KATHERINE S. LEE, Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff David Robinson brings this Americans with Disabilities Act case against Defendant Katherine S. Lee based on architectural barriers he encountered at Loard’s Ice Cream in Oakland, California. Defendant now moves for dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), arguing Plaintiff’s claims are moot because all the barriers alleged in Plaintiff’s complaint have been removed. ECF No. 22. Plaintiff filed an Opposition (ECF No. 23) and Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 24). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the March 13, 2025 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.1 II. …