Lopez
Lopez v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OKSANA LOPEZ, et al., Case No. 24-cv-04320-RS (LJC)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RESOLVING DISCOVERY
v. DISPUTE
HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC., Re: ECF No. 31 Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint discovery letter, ECF No. 31, regarding Defendant Harley-Davidson, Inc.’s deposition subpoena to Walkup, Melodia, Kelly & Schoenberger (WMKS), Plaintiff’s counsel. Harley-Davidson argues that the deposition is necessary to its efforts to collect and evaluate facts related to WMKS’s efforts to preserve a motorcycle that is at issue in this action. See also ECF No. 25 (previous Order addressing another subpoena seeking information about the motorcycle’s destruction). Having considered the parties’ joint letter and attachments, and the relevant authorities, the Court ORDERS as follows: WMKS need not comply with the subpoena at this time. Instead, within seven days, the parties shall meet and confer to determine a deadline for…