Papia

Papia v. County of Marin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20253:24-cv-06769California1,178 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 ANGELINA PAPIA, Case No. 24-cv-06769-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

COUNTY OF MARIN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 17. Defendants.

10 Plaintiff sues the County of Marin (the “County”), Marin County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff Jamie Scardina, County of Marin Department of Health and Human Services, Anthony Baylacq, and Doe Defendants for the death of Plaintiff’s son, Dylan Baylacq (“Mr. Baylacq”), while in custody at the Marin County Jail. (Dkt. No. 5.) Plaintiff brings claims under both 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and California state law. (Id. at 12-26.) The County and Sheriff Scardina move to dismiss the complaint on the grounds Plaintiff fails to state a claim for relief for her Section 1983 claims, and because Defendants are immune from liability under the state law claims. (Dkt. No. 17.) After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.