Navarro

Navarro v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20251:24-cv-00288California401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRACE NAVARRO, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00288-JLT-SAB 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND VACATING HEARING v. ON MOTION TO DISMISS 13 WALMART, INC., (ECF No. 40) 14 Defendant. 15 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a first amended consolidated class action complaint. Defendant Walmart, Inc. has filed a non-opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 41.) Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, leave to amend shall be freely given when justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). “In the absence of . . . undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of amendment, etc.—the leave sought should . . . be ‘freely given.’” Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962), quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.