John Roe JE 82 v. Doe 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 John Roe JE 82, Case No. 1:24-cv-01539 JLT BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

MOTION OF DEFENDANTS FOR AN

v. ORDER NAMING DOE DEENDANTS 1, 2,

AND 3 BY THEIR TRUE NAMES

DOE 1, et al., PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 10(a) 16 Defendants. (Doc. 30) 17 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER 19 Defendants have moved for an order naming Doe Defendants 1, 2, and 3 by their true names 20 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a). (Doc. 30) Because the Declaration of Defense Counsel 21 (Doc. 30-1) indicates that Plaintiff does not oppose the motion, the Court considers the matter ripe for 22 decision on the papers and thus VACATES the hearing on this motion, currently set for 4/9/2025. 23 Generally, California Code of Civil Procedure 340.1(k)-(l) requires defendants alleged to have 24 committed an act of childhood sexual assault to be named as Does until the plaintiff applies for 25 permission to substitute the true names, which may only be granted if…