BMO Bank N.A. v. Kular Transportation Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20251:24-cv-01568California392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BMO BANK N.A., Case No. 1:24-cv-01568-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING APRIL 8, 2025

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND

v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

KULAR TRANSPORTATION INC., et al.,

THIRTY-FIVE DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

15 Plaintiff commenced this action on December 19, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On February 27, 2025, the Clerk of the Court entered default against Defendants Kular Transportation Inc. and Lakhwinder Singh. (ECF No. 9.) The scheduling conference in this matter is currently set for April 8, 2025. (ECF No. 3.) Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.