John Roe RJ 50 v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20251:24-cv-01545California540 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
John Roe RJ 50, Case No. 1:24-CV-01545 JLT HBK District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston Plaintiff, Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta 13 vs. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER
DOE 1, et al.,
NAMING DOE DEFENDANTS 1, 2, AND
BY THEIR TRUE NAMES PURSUANT TO
16 Defendants. FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 10(a)
(Doc. 16) 19 Defendants have moved for an order naming Doe Defendants 1, 2, and 3 by their true names pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a). (Doc. 16.) The Declaration of Defense Counsel (Doc. 16-1) indicates that Plaintiff does not oppose the motion, and no opposition has been filed. Generally, California Code of Civil Procedure 340.1(k)-(l) requires defendants alleged to have committed an act of childhood sexual assault to be named as Does until the plaintiff applies for…