John Roe RJ 50 v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20251:24-cv-01545California540 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

John Roe RJ 50, Case No. 1:24-CV-01545 JLT HBK District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston Plaintiff, Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta 13 vs. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX

PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER

DOE 1, et al.,

NAMING DOE DEFENDANTS 1, 2, AND

BY THEIR TRUE NAMES PURSUANT TO

16 Defendants. FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 10(a)

(Doc. 16) 19 Defendants have moved for an order naming Doe Defendants 1, 2, and 3 by their true names pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a). (Doc. 16.) The Declaration of Defense Counsel (Doc. 16-1) indicates that Plaintiff does not oppose the motion, and no opposition has been filed. Generally, California Code of Civil Procedure 340.1(k)-(l) requires defendants alleged to have committed an act of childhood sexual assault to be named as Does until the plaintiff applies for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.