Doerer

(PC) Justus v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20251:25-cv-00138California1,944 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT JUSTUS, No. 1:25-cv-00138-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION J. DOERER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST THE

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

16 (ECF No. 5) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On December 18, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff has not filed a response and the time to do has expired. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.