Hales

Tri Tool, Inc. v. Hales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20252:22-cv-01515California4,737 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRI TOOL, INC., No. 2:22-cv-01515-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

ENERPAC TOOL GROUP CORP.’S MOTION

THAD HALES, et al., TO DISMISS CERTAIN OF PLAINTIFF’S

CLAIMS

Defendants. (Doc. No. 54) 16 This matter is before the court on the motion to dismiss certain of plaintiff’s claims filed by defendant Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (“Enerpac”) on August 16, 2024. (Doc. No. 54.) On September 16, 2024, the pending motion was taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 64.) For the reasons explained below, defendant Enerpac’s motion to dismiss will be granted without leave to amend. BACKGROUND On November 9, 2023, plaintiff Tri Tool, Inc. (“Tri Tool”), a company that designs high performance machine tools, filed its operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) against two of its former employees (defendants Thad Hales and Mike Bracikowski) and their new employer 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.