(PS) Love v. Tri-Counties Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20252:22-cv-01761California336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY LOVE, No. 2:22-cv-01761-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. TRI-COUNTIES BANK, Defendant. 16 Defendant Tri-Counties Bank (“Defendant”) filed a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees in this closed action against Plaintiff Mary Love (“Plaintiff”), who is now proceeding pro se. On February 10, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. The deadline has passed, and no objections were filed. Although it appears from the docket that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned as undeliverable, Plaintiff was properly served. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of her current address and service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. E.D. Cal. L.R. 182(f). The Court presumes that any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.