Manning

(PC) Fuentes v. Manning

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20252:23-cv-00386California2,320 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID FUENTES, SR., No. 2:23-0386 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MR. MANNING, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Defendants’ motion to compel discovery responses is before the Court. As discussed below, defendants’ motion is partially granted. I. BACKGROUND This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint (ECF No. 15) against defendants Mr. Manning and Ms. Kissel for their alleged failure to protect plaintiff from harm in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On June 11, 2024, the Court issued the Discovery and Scheduling Order, setting the discovery deadline for October 11, 2024, and the pretrial motions deadline for January 13, 2025. (ECF No. 27.) On August 14, 2024, the deadline for serving written discovery requests was extended to August 26, 2024, and the deadline to file any motions to compel was extended to October 25,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.