Vigil

Vigil v. DAK Resources, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20252:23-cv-00163California3,816 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH VIGIL, on behalf of himself and No. 2:23-cv-00163-TLN-AC all others similarly situated 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

MICHAELS STORES PROCUREMENT

COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation; DAK RESOURCES, INC., a Florida Corporation; and DOES 1 though 50, inclusive, 17 Defendant. 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Michaels Stores Procurement Company, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Deny Class Certification in Part.1 (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff Joseph Vigil (“Plaintiff”) filed a statement of non-opposition. (ECF No. 20.) Also before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff filed an opposition (ECF No. 25) and Defendant filed a reply (ECF No. 27). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Deny Class Certification in Part and GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. /// 27 Defendant DAK Resources, Inc. (“DAK Resources”) is also a named defendant in this action but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.