Cody
Cody v. County of San Joaquin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICHOLAS CODY, SKYLAR CODY, No. 2:23-cv-02318-TLN-CSK KAYCIE CODY, individually and as guardian ad litem for her minor children K.S.-1 and K.S.-2, ORDER Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., 16 Defendants.
18 This matter is before the Court on three separate motions: (1) Defendants Lazaro 19 Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”), Charlie Foo (“Foo”), and Rachel Apodaca’s (“Apodaca”) (collectively, 20 “Individual Defendants1”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30); (2) Defendant County of San 21 Joaquin’s (“County”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28); and (3) the County and Individual 22 Defendants’ (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Strike (ECF No. 29). Each motion has been 23 fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 33–38.) 24 For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part 25 Individual Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, DENIES the County’s Motion to Dismiss, and
The Court notes that while Defendant Claudette Butman (“Butman”) was named as a defendant in the instant action, Butman has not…