(SS)(PS) Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTIONETTE Y. SULLIVAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00016-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER ON PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF Nos. 16, 17, 19) 15 Defendant.
17 Plaintiff Antionette Y. Sullivan seeks judicial review of a final decision by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security denying an application for supplemental security income.1 In her summary judgment motions, Plaintiff challenges the accuracy of medical records contained in the Certified Administrative Record, but does not identify any error made by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The Commissioner opposes Plaintiff’s motion, filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, and seeks affirmance. For the reasons below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED and the Commissioner’s cross-motion is GRANTED. / / / 27 This action was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(15) and proceeds on the consent of all parties. (ECF…