Adams

(PC) Alcaraz v. Adams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20252:24-cv-00776California425 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TEODORO SEVERIANO ALCARAZ, No. 2:24-cv-0776 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ADAMS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 2, 2025, the court screened the complaint and found that plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claims to his health and safety against defendants Casillas, Fears, and Adams stated claims while his claims for deliberate indifference based on staff testing, medical deliberate indifference, equal protection, or due process claims were insufficient. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was given the option of amending the complaint or proceeding immediately on his cognizable claims against defendants Casillas, Fears, and Adams. Id. at 4-5. He was further advised that if he failed to notify the court how he wanted to proceed, the court would assume that he was choosing to proceed on the complaint as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.