(PS) Cramer v. El Dorado Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20252:24-cv-01982California383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WESTON CRAMER, No. 2:24-cv-01982-DJC-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS EL DORADO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et. al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action attempting to state a claim for an alleged civil rights violation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(3) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On September 30, 2024, the court issued an order and findings and recommendations screening the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and dismissing the complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint or to file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action. Plaintiff was warned that failure to respond would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time granted for plaintiff to respond has expired and plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint nor filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.