(PS) Sewell v. Franklin Credit Management Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20252:24-cv-02241California358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN A. SEWELL, No. 2:24-cv-02241 DJC CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 6, 2025, the undersigned issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff was advised that failure to allege a proper basis for jurisdiction would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not filed a response. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of these recommendations, IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of the findings and recommendations. With the exception of objections to the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.