(PS) Thompson v. Dept. of Consumer Affairs State of CA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LOUIS THOMPSON, No. 2:24-cv-02852 DAD CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS and

ORDER

DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER

AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 6, 2025, the undersigned issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff was advised that failure to allege a proper basis for jurisdiction would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has filed a response, to the order to show cause, but it does not allege a proper basis for federal jurisdiction. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In light of these recommendations, IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this action…