(PS) Moore v. C.F.Y. Development Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLESETTA MOORE. SR., et al., No. 2:25-cv-0034-DAD-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 C.F.Y. DEVELOPMENT INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A pro se complaint filed by plaintiff Charlesetta Moore (ECF No. 1) is before the court for screening. Plaintiff Moore also filed an application in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 2.) Plaintiff Moore’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The court grants plaintiff Moore leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).1

1 The complaint also lists Elizabeth McDaniels as a second plaintiff. However, McDaniels neither signed the complaint nor submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper ... be signed by … a party personally if the party is unrepresented.” Fed. R. Civ.…